Burial is cremation's list minus the cremation-specific forms, plus a permit — a rule the August 28 Kearney session finally confirmed. Here is the flow, colour-coded by what that session resolved, what it verified, and what remains a genuine blind spot.
Draft v0.3 was written as the question list for a Kearney burial discovery session. That session happened on August 28. It collapsed most of the per-item guesswork into a single structural rule — and moved the real uncertainty from "which forms exist" to "whose job is the permit, and is a headstone even in scope."
Same list minus cremation-specific forms; add burial/interment permit. Cascade container order confirmed applicable; cemetery coordination handled operationally.FD + R/OS Team Meeting — Aug 28, 2026 · Kearney (J. Fong, J. Robinson)
Phases 1–5 and 7–8 mirror cremation almost exactly. The divergence lives in Phase 6 — now split into what the system tracks and what happens off-system.
Identical to cremation, disposition-agnostic
Embalming leans default here, not waiver
Where burial actually diverges — split three ways
Full-prep norm; a return branch instead of remains handoff
Burial uses the same disposition-authorization form as cremation. v0.3's #1 question — answered.
The burial/interment permit is confirmed real, and the cascade container order confirmed applicable.
Existence is settled; ownership of the burial/interment permit is now the highest-priority unknown.
Untouched on Aug 28. Is a monument even in Kearney's scope? Is the pallbearer list distinct or folded into the Service Sheet?